[consult] Call for Consultation - Suggestion to Remove the WHOIS Query Result Limit
Duque Juan
Juan.Duque at movilnet.com.ve
Tue Mar 13 09:22:26 EDT 2007
Hello,
Pleasure of greeting them,
I sent an e-mail several days ago, to do a consultation on IP's acquisition and ACE Public, but the response already her indicated the group of www.lacnic.net.
Thank you very much
Call me questions
Greetings
Juan Duque
Consultor de proyectos
Gerencia de Desarrollo e Integración de Productos
Telecomunicaciones Movilnet.
+58-212-705.72.90
+58-416-606.27.10
juan.duque at movilnet.com.ve
-----Mensaje original-----
De: consult-bounces at arin.net [mailto:consult-bounces at arin.net] En nombre de michael.c.loevner at verizon.com
Enviado el: Martes, 13 de Marzo de 2007 09:08 a.m.
Para: Edward Lewis
CC: consult-bounces at arin.net; consult at arin.net
Asunto: Re: [consult] Call for Consultation - Suggestion to Remove the WHOIS Query Result Limit
I've run into situations in the past where I can't lookup all of the
resources of a company that we may be acquiring or merging with because of
the 256 record limit. One improvement that could be made to the WHOIS
that might help is to include a mechanism that allows one to query for
direct allocations only for a particular OrgID or registration holder
name.
Also, ARIN staff has been helpful in the past in providing the full query
when the number of returned records exceed 256. For myself, the
infrequency with which I run into the query limit doesn't warrant a
change, especially since ARIN staff is willing to provide the larger
dataset if needed. If anybody runs into this limit frequently, I'd like
to hear about it.
-Mike
"Edward Lewis" <Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz>
Sent by: consult-bounces at arin.net
03/12/2007 09:41 PM
To
consult at arin.net
cc
Subject
Re: [consult] Call for Consultation - Suggestion to Remove the WHOIS Query
Result Limit
What kinds of numbers are we looking at?
I mean, like, of all the "meaningful" queries, what would return the
most? How many would be over 1000? When I say "meaningful" I am
subjectively insinuating we don't care to honor data mining queries.
(O *)
There are only two reasons to limit the number. Budget for servers
and bandwith is one, the other is data mining. It's hard to know
what makes sense without more detail on why 256 is a problem and
whether it should be, say, doubled or more.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar
Sarcasm doesn't scale.
_______________________________________________
consult mailing list
consult at arin.net
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/consult
_______________________________________________
consult mailing list
consult at arin.net
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/consult
More information about the ARIN-consult
mailing list