Exchange point requests for IPv6 address space
Marc Blanchet
Marc.Blanchet at viagenie.qc.ca
Sat May 12 09:55:54 EDT 2001
- Previous message: Exchange point requests for IPv6 address space
- Next message: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-iesg-ipv6-addressing-recommendations-01.txt
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At/À 18:32 2001-05-11 +0000, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com you wrote/vous écriviez: > > > > > > The question that I have is.. > > > > Are the routing protocols used in v6 going to change significantly from > > the ones we have now? If not then provider aggregation is more > > important than ever. I think that discussing micro allocations in > > v6 without also addressing how they're going to be routed/aggregated, > > is a huge mistake. They go hand in hand. > > > >Not wanting to answer for Mark here but: I know of three routing >protocols that support IPv6 today: > BGP > RIP > OSPF (sort of) IS-IS. will see support from vendors soon. Marc. >The predominant ones are BGP and RIP. Routing architecture and protocol >design are being done elsewhere... so I expect that discussing >IPv6 micro-allocations is perhaps a bit premature. (See the recent >Paul Francis draft on v6 multihoming... has some interesting ramifications >for addressing policy. But I doubt it will fly. Too radical.) > >--bill
- Previous message: Exchange point requests for IPv6 address space
- Next message: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-iesg-ipv6-addressing-recommendations-01.txt
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the V6WG mailing list