Closure?

At/À 16:14 2001-01-26 +0000, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com you wrote/vous 
écriviez:

>Good morning folks.


as a ca*net3 representative, we do agree with the IESG/IAB proposal.



>         This is to remind you that ARIN is still holding out on accepting the
>IAB/IESG recommendations for inital IPv6 delegation/allocation sizes. There
>was some lively discussion at the last mtg but the concerns generally came
>down to... "this makes me nervous and I don't understand it all to well."
>Yes, there are operational concerns but quite frankly, the number of people
>in the ARIN region that are able/willing to explore IPv6 seems to be either
>very small, not willing to share experiences, or are happy with the 6bone
>delegations.  ARIN has pretty much removed the barriers to entry with the
>zero-cost delegation policy in place.
>
>         Unless a viable counter proposal or modification to the existing
>IAB/IESG proposal that has been accepted by RIPE and APNIC, I'm going
>to recommend to the ARIN council that silence is consent and ARIN should
>adopt the IAB/IESG proposal for a /48 being the default delegation size,

for any organisation. (obvious but just want to make sure...)

>subject to review, based on operational experience.
>
>--bill

Regards, Marc.


Marc Blanchet
Viagénie inc.
tel: 418-656-9254
http://www.viagenie.qc.ca

----------------------------------------------------------
Normos (http://www.normos.org): Internet standards portal:
IETF RFC, drafts, IANA, W3C, ATMForum, ISO, ... all in one place.