[ppml] IPv6 flawed?
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Mon Sep 17 18:36:25 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Next message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sep 17, 2007, at 6:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > what is critical to ipv6 deployment is vendor support, vendor support, > and did i mention vendor support; from the core to the edge. with > nat-pt + algs for dns, http, smtp, and sip. otherwise the cost to > move > to v6 is bigger than v4 nat; end of game. > > but this is not really the list for this. Serious question: what's the right list? Regards, -drc
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Next message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list