[ppml] IPv6 flawed?
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Sep 17 12:34:52 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Next message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> was anybody else here alive at the time microsoft decided to get into IP? which time? there were three. the last one stuck. with deep enough pockets, a 1000kg gorilla can afford a few failures. what is critical to ipv6 deployment is vendor support, vendor support, and did i mention vendor support; from the core to the edge. with nat-pt + algs for dns, http, smtp, and sip. otherwise the cost to move to v6 is bigger than v4 nat; end of game. but this is not really the list for this. randy
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Next message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list