[ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing - Discussion and Support/Non-SupportRequested
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Thu Oct 4 18:34:11 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing - Discussion and Support/Non-SupportRequested
- Next message: [ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing - Discussion and Support/Non-SupportRequested
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ted, On Oct 3, 2007, at 1:45 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > I am opposed to this policy for the following reasons: > > 1) No public mechanism is specified for proof of utilization. > 2) No mechanism is specified for continuing proof of 100% utilization. No mechanism is specified because I assume ARIN staff will use the same mechanism they use today. Regards, -drc
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing - Discussion and Support/Non-SupportRequested
- Next message: [ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing - Discussion and Support/Non-SupportRequested
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list