[ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown
Bill Darte
BillD at cait.wustl.edu
Sun Mar 18 05:28:56 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown
- Next message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
One hopes that is and will be the facts, yet I continue to hear ringing in my head...advice from long ago.. "it is neither legal nor illegal until the LAST judge says so"... -----Original Message----- From: ppml-bounces at arin.net on behalf of John Curran Sent: Sat 3/17/2007 8:16 PM To: David Conrad Cc: Public Policy Mailing List Subject: Re: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown At 3:03 PM -0700 3/17/07, David Conrad wrote: >On Mar 17, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Howard, W. Lee wrote: > > Those who need IP resources need to play by the community's rules. > >My question was whether or not this had been established in the >Kremen case. In this particular case, the modified court order specifies that Kremen must agree to an ARIN registration services agreement, and hence be bound by the community's policies. To see if this establishes a legal precedent, one should ask a lawyer, but it definitely upholds the theory that "Those who need *ARIN-allocated* IP resources need to play by the community's rules." /John _______________________________________________ This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML at arin.net). Manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/attachments/20070318/50767332/attachment.html
- Previous message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown
- Next message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list