<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7651.59">
<TITLE>RE: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>One hopes that is and will be the facts, yet I continue to hear ringing in my head...advice from long ago..<BR>
"it is neither legal nor illegal until the LAST judge says so"...<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: ppml-bounces@arin.net on behalf of John Curran<BR>
Sent: Sat 3/17/2007 8:16 PM<BR>
To: David Conrad<BR>
Cc: Public Policy Mailing List<BR>
Subject: Re: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown<BR>
<BR>
At 3:03 PM -0700 3/17/07, David Conrad wrote:<BR>
>On Mar 17, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Howard, W. Lee wrote:<BR>
> > Those who need IP resources need to play by the community's rules.<BR>
><BR>
>My question was whether or not this had been established in the<BR>
>Kremen case.<BR>
<BR>
In this particular case, the modified court order specifies that Kremen<BR>
must agree to an ARIN registration services agreement, and hence be<BR>
bound by the community's policies. To see if this establishes a legal<BR>
precedent, one should ask a lawyer, but it definitely upholds the theory<BR>
that "Those who need *ARIN-allocated* IP resources need to play by<BR>
the community's rules."<BR>
<BR>
/John<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List<BR>
(PPML@arin.net).<BR>
Manage your mailing list subscription at:<BR>
<A HREF="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml</A><BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>