[ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown
Leo Bicknell
bicknell at ufp.org
Wed Mar 14 20:21:55 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown
- Next message: [ppml] Global Policies and Coordinated Policies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In a message written on Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:05:00AM -0000, michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: > In case you hadn't noticed, this policy proposal was made by people from > outside the ARIN region. The same proposal was put before APNIC in their > own region. They are attempting to create a global policy without > following the global policy process of NRO > http://www.nro.net/policy/index.html So here's the problem with the NRO process on that page. I'm going to quote the first paragraph, broken down: Step #1: "Any individual may submit a global proposal." Submit to who? In what form? This page has no location for someone to submit a global proposal to the NRO, no method to submit it to ICANN, and no method to submit it to the RIR's. Given that this statement is 100% unclear, it makes sense to infer you should submit it to the RIR's, primarily due to the next step... Step #2: "Each RIR community must ratify an identical version of the proposed policy." With the three existing global policies the authors have submitted identical proposals to all the RIR's, just as this author has done. Given that Step #1 is completely unclear, and we have three cases where submitting it to all the RIR's worked, I'd say that's the de facto standard on how to submit a global policy. Step #3: "The NRO Executive Council (NRO EC) then refers the coordinated proposal to the ASO Address Council (ASO AC), which reviews the process by which the proposal was developed and, under the terms of the ASO Memorandum of Understanding, passes it to the ICANN Board of Directors for ratification as a global policy." Clearly can't be done until all of the RIR's have passed the policy proposals in each region. In short, I take issue with you saying they are not following the global policy process. The global policy has a huge issue with step #1, and as far as I can tell three cases where it has been essentially skipped. Maybe we need a global policy to clarify the global policy. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/attachments/20070314/5380e51d/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown
- Next message: [ppml] Global Policies and Coordinated Policies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list