[ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
John Santos
JOHN at egh.com
Thu Jun 7 16:35:05 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Next message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, David Conrad wrote: > On Jun 7, 2007, at 2:50 AM, John Santos wrote: > >> On May 31, 2007, at 6:40 PM, John Santos wrote: > >>> All I'm saying is people should be entitled > >>> to permanent IP addresses, for as long as they need them > >> Think about this clearly. Where is this infinite resource coming > >> from? > > If 128 bits isn't enough, then maybe its time to start thinking about > > ipv7! :-) > > Realistically, it isn't 128 bits. > > 64 bits off the bottom are used for the EUI. > 8 or 16 bits in the middle are used for local topology. > 3 bits off the top are used for format specifier. > > So, it is actually 45 or 53 bits. > > > I didn't say anything about routing. I was talking about addresses. > > Generally, the two are intertwined. If you don't care about routing, > pick a number at random. They're just integers after all. The magic words, "private network", appeared in the next paragraph you snipped, don't remember if I made it clear I was talking about private internets, not intranets. > > Rgds, > -drc > > > -- John Santos Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc. 781-861-0670 ext 539
- Previous message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Next message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list