[ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Thu Jun 7 13:19:02 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Next message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jun 7, 2007, at 2:50 AM, John Santos wrote: >> On May 31, 2007, at 6:40 PM, John Santos wrote: >>> All I'm saying is people should be entitled >>> to permanent IP addresses, for as long as they need them >> Think about this clearly. Where is this infinite resource coming >> from? > If 128 bits isn't enough, then maybe its time to start thinking about > ipv7! :-) Realistically, it isn't 128 bits. 64 bits off the bottom are used for the EUI. 8 or 16 bits in the middle are used for local topology. 3 bits off the top are used for format specifier. So, it is actually 45 or 53 bits. > I didn't say anything about routing. I was talking about addresses. Generally, the two are intertwined. If you don't care about routing, pick a number at random. They're just integers after all. Rgds, -drc
- Previous message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Next message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list