[ppml] IPv4 "Up For Grabs" proposal
Ted Mittelstaedt
tedm at ipinc.net
Thu Jul 5 17:15:59 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv4 "Up For Grabs" proposal
- Next message: [ppml] IPv4 "Up For Grabs" proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>-----Original Message----- >From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net]On Behalf Of >McTim >Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 1:59 PM >To: ARIN PPML >Subject: Re: [ppml] IPv4 "Up For Grabs" proposal > > >On 7/5/07, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at ipinc.net> wrote: > >> >> The only chaos would be among legacy IPv4 assignments > >patently false, chaos would ensue for all. "legacy" space holders, >"grabbers", and everyone who has to decide whom to listen to when >these blocks are announced. > Why, all they have to do is look and see if the block is registered in an RIR. > >If they haven't yet, they probably won't. It doesn't look like you'll >get consensus on this one. If there is no consensus on what to do with the IPv4 blocks held by the legacy holders after 20% of the Internet has become IPv6 only, then there is absolutely no point in proposing any further policies dealing with IPv4 runout, because people really honestly don't want to switch over. The IPv4 runout has become Somebody Else's Problem, and as long as it is such, Somebody Else is going to solve it. Hopefully you read Douglas Adams so you get the reference. Ted
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv4 "Up For Grabs" proposal
- Next message: [ppml] IPv4 "Up For Grabs" proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list