[ppml] IPv4 "Up For Grabs" proposal

On 7/5/07, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at ipinc.net> wrote:

>
> The only chaos would be among legacy IPv4 assignments

patently false, chaos would ensue for all.   "legacy" space holders,
"grabbers", and everyone who has to decide whom to listen to when
these blocks are announced.

> that the legacy holders refuse to sign an RSA for,

they don't need to, see slide 9 on the link that Randy sent in a
different thread.

>and the legacy
> holders of such blocks could fix that easily by just signing an
> RSA.
>

If they haven't yet, they probably won't.  It doesn't look like you'll
get consensus on this one.


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
$ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim