[ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Tue Jul 3 17:18:01 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > Legacy domain names were also free and free from any annual > renewal requirement. That was changed without any negotiation > that I can remember. Couldn't that same political process > be used to convert legacy address registrations to an annual > renewal system? > Here's the thing... Domain names don't function without DNS. IP Assignments function reasonably well without DNS although not having reverse DNS can be an inconvenience. Usually it is not inconvenient to the address holder for the most part, however. > Maybe they lawyers could answer this: What IS the legal difference > between legacy address space and legacy domain names? > I don't know about the legal difference, but, operationally, I would say dependencies and the agreements/statements made at the time the RIRs were created. Owen > - Kevin > _______________________________________________ > This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List > (PPML at arin.net). > Manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list