[ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
Kevin Loch
kloch at kl.net
Tue Jul 3 16:45:50 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush wrote: > and three years later, the holder decides to announce and it becomes > lawyerville. > > there is a root problem. rightly or wrongly, folk were given space with > what we would consider today to be insufficient constraints on contact, > fees. justification of need, ... that was a contract, whether we like > it or not. > > the world has changed. we would like to change those contracts. well, > we're gonna have to *negotiate* that. and acting unilaterally or > arbitrarily will only polarize and make a mess we just don't need. Legacy domain names were also free and free from any annual renewal requirement. That was changed without any negotiation that I can remember. Couldn't that same political process be used to convert legacy address registrations to an annual renewal system? Maybe they lawyers could answer this: What IS the legal difference between legacy address space and legacy domain names? - Kevin
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list