[ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
Stephen Sprunk
stephen at sprunk.org
Tue Jul 3 11:53:11 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thus spake "Kevin Loch" <kloch at kl.net> > A $1/yr per address block, or other similar low flat rate fee > would shake out the 'ghost' registrants and would be beneficial > to everyone. As would a policy that directed ARIN to attempt to determine the "liveness" of legacy blocks by checking the BGP tables and making reasonable attempts to reach the last known holder (~50% of which haven't been updated since ARIN's formation). > Anything aimed at reclaiming inefficiently used legacy space > would be going against the promise to maintain the status quo. If you restrict that claim to revocation of legacy space still in use (whether justified or not), I completely agree. I do not believe that asking people to voluntarily return what they're not using is a violation of that promise. One can debate whether reclaiming blocks that aren't "live" (see above) is a violation. S Stephen Sprunk "Those people who think they know everything CCIE #3723 are a great annoyance to those of us who do." K5SSS --Isaac Asimov
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list