[ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
Kevin Loch
kloch at kl.net
Tue Jul 3 11:01:19 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Hannigan wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org> >> Some of us registered our domain names back at a time when >> they were free. At some point NSF/NSI decided we should >> pay a yearly fee, and simply started charging it. There >> was no revolt. > > There was no pending shortage either, and I seem to recall > an outcry when NSI implemented fees. I had to dig for $5. We > are magnitudes more users at this time so if domain names > were free today and the same thing happened, there would be > a riot. It's fair to say we had the equivalent riot back > then. > It stuck because they had the full support of the US Govt to do it. A $1/yr per address block, or other similar low flat rate fee would shake out the 'ghost' registrants and would be beneficial to everyone. Anything aimed at reclaiming inefficiently used legacy space would be going against the promise to maintain the status quo. - Kevin
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list