[ppml] mail auth proposals, was Re: the "other"...
Martin Hannigan
martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs
Mon Apr 9 15:25:18 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] mail auth proposals, was Re: the "other"...
- Next message: [ppml] The authentication proposals, 1, 2, 3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz> To: "Martin Hannigan" <martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs> Cc: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz>, Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org>, ppml at arin.net Subject: Re: [ppml] mail auth proposals, was Re: the "other"... Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:47:40 -0400 > At 11:33 -0400 4/9/07, Martin Hannigan wrote: > > >not a civil proceeding. Not a lawyer, never studied law, > >never passed > >the bar, not a paralegal. Jury Duty. > > Maybe this is something ARIN staff can get us a statement > from the legal council on. Might be helpful to hear this > before the Public Policy meeting. Sure, I support that. My experience tells me they're going to say what we said, but certainly with more flair and definately authoritative. -M<
- Previous message: [ppml] mail auth proposals, was Re: the "other"...
- Next message: [ppml] The authentication proposals, 1, 2, 3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list