Search Engines

Adaptation?  Has anybody considered having ISPs proxy all their dialup
customers?  That represents significant IP usage.

Web hosts are not the only type of organization which requires large
numbers of IPs.

FWIW, overall, I do support ARIN's IP restrictions, but I do not support
their instantaneous implementation of such policies.  Such changes to take
time, and it seems that time is not something which was taken into account
with this policy.

--------------------------------------------------- 
Mark Rekai - INetU, Inc.(tm) - http://www.INetU.net 
Electronic commerce - Web development - Web hosting 
       Mark at INetU.net - Phone: (610) 266-7441


On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Torsey, Brian wrote:

> 
> If this is true, then the search engine folks need to fix the problem that
> they are creating. (Yo, ARIN ... time to start talking with the search
> engine folks!!!!)
> 
> The policy is a good one. Its not perfect, and it will mean some issues will
> have to be delt with.
> 
> If you wanted everything to be perfect and work as is out of the box ... why
> would you want to be an Engineer?  :)
> 
> 
> Adapt/improve/enhance
> 
> Progress does not come without conflict.
> 
> 
> Brian Torsey
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Lee [mailto:Brian_Lee at interliant.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 11:07 AM
> To: policy at arin.net
> Subject: Search Engines
> 
> 
> A number of people have told us that name based hosting affect placement on
> search engines.  They basically say that search engines does not recognize
> host headers.  Have you heard anything on this or do you know of any plans
> for search engines to comply with the new name based hosting policy?
> 
> Brian Lee
> Interliant Sales
> Cobalt Subject Matter Expert
> 800 266-4000 x5135 (voice)
> 770 673-2200 (intl)
> 770 673-2298 (fax)
> Visit our Site at http://www.interliant.com
> blee at interliant.com
>