FW: Long over due
Kim Hubbard
kimh at arin.net
Wed May 10 14:40:39 EDT 2000
- Previous message: FW: Long over due
- Next message: transfer process
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 12:01 PM 5/10/00 -0600, Jason Redisch wrote: >Thanks Danny, > What I am proposing is that if both companies involved in a merger are >registered ARIN ISP's that have a history with ARIN, then the justification >of the transfer between the two maintainer ID's should be included with the >justification the next time an ISP has to go back for more IP space. This >way the ISP's can focus on the mergers and ARIN can focus more energy on >transfers between entities without a history. Wouldn't this slow down the process for requesting more addresses? Usually, when an ISP is requesting more addresses they're in a bigger time crunch than when they're asking for a transfer. Perhaps asking for utilization of the addresses isn't required as long as the legal documention looks good. The ISPs that have a history with ARIN isn't as big a problem (from out viewpoint) as those orgs that we've never heard of and will never hear of again. Kim > > The main logic behind this change is that both ISP's had already justified >their IP space to ARIN under the current ARIN policy. They still must show >they have a need for the combined IP space, but there is no reason this >cannot be combined with the justification at the time of their next request. > >Questions: > >Should end users be included in this as well or should it only impact ISP to >ISP mergers as end users may not have the need to ever come back to ARIN >again? What about ISP end user mergers? > >What does is mean to have a history with ARIN? A number of additional space >requests? Some period of time? > >If something like this is approved what additional changes should be made >the transfer policy for those organizations who do not fall under this new >policy? Increased cost? More justification? > >Is this worth the time to discuss or should we be looking at just making >transfers more difficult across the board? > >/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ >Jason Redisch (w) 720-528-4368 >Sr IP Engineer (f) 720-528-4361 >Virtela Communications > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: danny at sofos.tcb.net [mailto:danny at sofos.tcb.net]On Behalf Of Danny >McPherson >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 11:18 AM >To: jredisch at virtela.com >Cc: policy at arin.net >Subject: Re: FW: Long over due > > > > >> I have some ideas about how we might be able to better protect the >community >> from 'unjustified' transfers and would really like to hear others input >> on this topic. > >I'll bite, what were your ideas? > >-danny
- Previous message: FW: Long over due
- Next message: transfer process
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the POLICY mailing list