past vs future use
Gordon Cook
cook at NETAXS.COM
Mon Jun 30 13:17:34 EDT 1997
- Previous message: past vs future use
- Next message: Value of telephone numbers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Larry, I have spent most of the last five days looking at these same issues. I see some procedural issues that might be made a little clearer. I see continuing need for the institutionalization of IANA authority....ASAP. What I have *not seen* is any shread of evidence of effort on the part of the big guys to shut the little guys out. I believe you are drawing conclusions from the evidence that after, further probing, turn out to be unjustified. I do not think you have been irreparably harmed by the refusal of a 19/. I also do not think that if you come back a year from now there will be any reason why you should not have been able to show enough growth to get a 19/. I also think that as soon as ARIN is up and running....with members and its own policies, that the allocation policies will likely change in such a way that you will be able to get a 19/. my advice is to work on building your network and give these processes more time to work. Gordon 'not-a-doormat-of-the-bigboys' Cook ************************************************************************ The COOK Report on Internet For subsc. pricing & more than 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA ten megabytes of free material (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) visit http://cookreport.com/ Internet: cook at cookreport.com On line speech of critics under attack by Ewing NJ School Board, go to http://cookreport.com/sboard.shtml ************************************************************************ On Mon, 30 Jun 1997, Larry Vaden wrote: > At 07:06 AM 6/30/97 -0400, Paul Ferguson wrote: > >At 10:41 AM 06/29/97 -0500, Larry Vaden wrote: > > > >> > >>More to the point, RB and other powers that be are not proposing that the > >>big players economize on their use of router slots, which would make room > >>(if you listen to the limited memory argument) for small multi-homed ISPs. > >> > > > >I think you are missing the point yourself, Larrykins. > > Actually, Paul, what you guys don't like is that I get it. I get the use > of diminutive forms of people's names by you and David Conrad, I get the > "geographical monopoly" stuff from David Conrad and Daniel Kerrenberg, and > I get that Randy Bush's "plonking" is acceptable in a sideline commentator, > but insufferable as a representative of ARIN. > > I'm reminded of Thomas (Tommy to y'all, correct?) Carter's invention of the > Carterfone, which Bell disallowed to be connected to the network before > several in or around the discussion were in grade school. I can't help but > wonder where we would all be if that use of fear and protectionism (as has > occurred in this thread) by Bell had not been overturned by the court > system y'all seem to disdain. Modems were $1/baud and memory was $1/byte > if you bought it by the megabyte. > > I would like to see more constructive suggestions about how to deal with > today's Carterfone case (small multi-homed ISPs). The question is not > whether you guys know how to do it, but whether you're willing to permit > today's Carterfone or you wish to force an industry consolidation and > thereby get rid of today's Carterfone. > > Those favoring the status quo, complete with continuation of the > monopolies, might want to read "Cutting the Barbed Wire: Lessons of a > Reformed Monopolist", a speech given by Robert E. Allen, Chairman and CEO > of AT&T, at the University of Texas last year. > > There's a lot of other reading about the historical Carterfone decision > which might serve to help some of the writers and yes, actors in the legal > sense, on this mailing list. > > Could we turn to constructive and timely suggestions on how to deal with > the small, multi-homed ISP, please? If not, the alternative is to see how > "Carterfone II" is decided. I prefer the former over the latter. Don't you? > > > --- > > Larry Vaden, founder and CEO help-desk 903-813-4500 > Internet Texoma, Inc. direct 903-870-0365 > <http://www.texoma.net> fax 903-868-8551 > bringing the real Internet to rural Texomaland pager 903-867-6571 >
- Previous message: past vs future use
- Next message: Value of telephone numbers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list