past vs future use
Larry Vaden
vaden at texoma.net
Mon Jun 30 10:41:46 EDT 1997
- Previous message: Value of telephone numbers
- Next message: past vs future use
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 07:06 AM 6/30/97 -0400, Paul Ferguson wrote: >At 10:41 AM 06/29/97 -0500, Larry Vaden wrote: > >> >>More to the point, RB and other powers that be are not proposing that the >>big players economize on their use of router slots, which would make room >>(if you listen to the limited memory argument) for small multi-homed ISPs. >> > >I think you are missing the point yourself, Larrykins. Actually, Paul, what you guys don't like is that I get it. I get the use of diminutive forms of people's names by you and David Conrad, I get the "geographical monopoly" stuff from David Conrad and Daniel Kerrenberg, and I get that Randy Bush's "plonking" is acceptable in a sideline commentator, but insufferable as a representative of ARIN. I'm reminded of Thomas (Tommy to y'all, correct?) Carter's invention of the Carterfone, which Bell disallowed to be connected to the network before several in or around the discussion were in grade school. I can't help but wonder where we would all be if that use of fear and protectionism (as has occurred in this thread) by Bell had not been overturned by the court system y'all seem to disdain. Modems were $1/baud and memory was $1/byte if you bought it by the megabyte. I would like to see more constructive suggestions about how to deal with today's Carterfone case (small multi-homed ISPs). The question is not whether you guys know how to do it, but whether you're willing to permit today's Carterfone or you wish to force an industry consolidation and thereby get rid of today's Carterfone. Those favoring the status quo, complete with continuation of the monopolies, might want to read "Cutting the Barbed Wire: Lessons of a Reformed Monopolist", a speech given by Robert E. Allen, Chairman and CEO of AT&T, at the University of Texas last year. There's a lot of other reading about the historical Carterfone decision which might serve to help some of the writers and yes, actors in the legal sense, on this mailing list. Could we turn to constructive and timely suggestions on how to deal with the small, multi-homed ISP, please? If not, the alternative is to see how "Carterfone II" is decided. I prefer the former over the latter. Don't you? --- Larry Vaden, founder and CEO help-desk 903-813-4500 Internet Texoma, Inc. direct 903-870-0365 <http://www.texoma.net> fax 903-868-8551 bringing the real Internet to rural Texomaland pager 903-867-6571
- Previous message: Value of telephone numbers
- Next message: past vs future use
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list