(IPng 4133) Re: An idea to bounce off people: storing routing info in the DNS instead of the routers.
Michael Gersten
michael at STB.INFO.COM
Thu Jul 24 19:26:00 EDT 1997
- Previous message: (IPng 4177) Re: An idea to bounce off people: storing routing info in the DNS instead of the routers.
- Next message: (IPng 4133) Re: An idea to bounce off people: storing routing info in the DNS instead of the routers.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yes, 2 years is the outside limit, given the demand for routable IP's. This idea of mine is intended to allow V4 systems, with 100% compatibility, to have routables /31's or /32's (assuming that a /32 won't crash the kernel). As people have pointed out to me, strict compatibility won't happen, but if the ISP's and backbones upgrade, it will work; if and when people upgrade their own systems (windows 98, etc), then the load is moved even more to the source sites and away from the center. The point is: If the whole reason for rushing v6 is "Get routable IP's", then it's a false argument. There are other ways to get routable IP's that do not require all existing v4 applications to be incompatible. [Did a solution to a v4 program talking to a v6 host ever get developed? I was off the list for about 4 months this year]
- Previous message: (IPng 4177) Re: An idea to bounce off people: storing routing info in the DNS instead of the routers.
- Next message: (IPng 4133) Re: An idea to bounce off people: storing routing info in the DNS instead of the routers.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list