Rebuttal to Mr. Weisberg's insinuations
Jim Fleming
JimFleming at unety.net
Sun Jul 20 14:54:36 EDT 1997
- Previous message: (IPng 4133) Re: An idea to bounce off people: storing routing info in the DNS instead of the routers.
- Next message: Rebuttal to Mr. Weisberg's insinuations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sunday, July 20, 1997 1:06 AM, David R. Conrad[SMTP:davidc at APNIC.NET] wrote: @ Jimmy, @ @ >@Home was allocated most of the space in 24.X.X.X directly by Jon @ >Postel. @ @ Most? 1/64 == "most"? Interesting math. @ Five (or 4.5) /16s in an address space that supports 256 is not 1/64...you might want to check your math... ...or the DNS... 0.24.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 518400 NS NS1.HOME.NET. 1.24.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 518400 NS NS1.HOME.NET. 2.24.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 518400 NS NS1.HOME.NET. 3.24.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 518400 NS NS1.HOME.NET. 4.24.IN-ADDR.ARPA. 518400 NS NS1.HOME.NET. You could have also deduced this by looking at the "whois" information....which you said everyone understands... of course, it does not match the IN-ADDR.ARPA information... @Home Network (NETBLK-ATHOME) ATHOME 24.0.0.0 - 24.4.127.255 ===== The point that you are missing is that when the 24.X.X.X space was first opened up, those other cable TV companies did not have allocations, delegations, etc. For some reason the cable TV industry was singled out as different from the ISPs. When these types of decisions are made, it might be useful to have some public discussion, some archives, etc. Of course the same can be said for ARIN... -- Jim Fleming Unir Corporation
- Previous message: (IPng 4133) Re: An idea to bounce off people: storing routing info in the DNS instead of the routers.
- Next message: Rebuttal to Mr. Weisberg's insinuations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list