ISP Address Coalition (ISPAC) (was a 2nd potential solution)
Larry Vaden
vaden at texoma.net
Wed Jul 16 10:09:13 EDT 1997
- Previous message: a 2nd potential solution
- Next message: "Competing" registries (was Re: A new American registry? - Welcome to discussions)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This idea (ISPAC, pronounced "ice pack"), was originally proposed by Tony Li as an Internet Draft (draft-li-ispac-00.txt), which has been deleted due to expiration. It can be found, however, at http://www.globecom.net/(nobg,sv)/ietf/draft/draft-li-ispac-00.shtml. In addition, Yakov Rekhter writes of a PowerPoint presentation: "There is also a presentation on this topic from Tony and myself that was made at the last year IEPG meeting. The presentation is available via anonymous ftp from ftpeng.cisco.com under /ftp/yakov/spa-vs-pac.ppt (PowerPoint)." ---30--- At 11:13 PM 7/15/97 -0500, Larry Vaden wrote: >A second potential market solution would be for a group of ISPs with common >interests to join forces and apply for a suitably sized CIDR block directly >from the IANA. > >In this scenario, the ISPs would not be using "provider dependent (AKA PA)" >space, but rather PI space. > >This same group of ISPs with common interests then would issue an RFP for a >"group buy" and then select 2 or 3 NSPs to carry their traffic through the >normal commercial negotiations process. Because the ISPs were allocated PI >space out of the same address block, aggregation would be possible and likely. > >If you are interested in contributing to the discussion, please send e-mail >to nair-founders-request at texoma.net with a message body of "subscribe". > >
- Previous message: a 2nd potential solution
- Next message: "Competing" registries (was Re: A new American registry? - Welcome to discussions)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list