Forcible reclamation?

On Tue, Jul 08, 1997 at 12:29:19PM -0500, Larry Vaden wrote:
> At 11:03 AM 7/8/97 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
> >
> >The existing space is adequate for a *long* time, provided that we do
> >reasonable things with it.
> >
> >If we start to run out, we can go take back all the people's space who
> >haven't met even 20% of the current requirements (ie: actual utilization
> >below 10% of allocated) -- that should reclaim all of the existing Class "A"
> >addresses, which is 1/4 of the total allocated, and 1/2 of the total
> >possible IPV4 space.
> 
> If I understand you correctly, you would move to reclaim, say, a /8 with 0%
> utilization before a /16 with 0% utilization before a /19 with 33%
> utilization, correct?
> 
> 
> ---
> Larry Vaden, founder and CEO                       help-desk 903-813-4500
> Internet Texoma, Inc. <http://www.texoma.net>    direct line 903-870-0365
> bringing the real Internet to rural Texomaland           fax 903-868-8551
> Member of ISP/C, TISPA and USIPA                       pager 903-867-6571

Of course.

The greatest good and the most results should come first.

This is assuming the goal is to obtain address space (ie: we're "out" and
need to do so).

Again, the goal drives the process, not the other way around.

--
-- 
Karl Denninger (karl at MCS.Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity
http://www.mcs.net/~karl     | T1's from $600 monthly to FULL DS-3 Service
			     | 99 Analog numbers, 77 ISDN, http://www.mcs.net/
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| NOW Serving 56kbps DIGITAL on our analog lines!
Fax:   [+1 312 803-4929]     | 2 FULL DS-3 Internet links; 400Mbps B/W Internal