Forcible reclamation?
Larry Vaden
vaden at texoma.net
Tue Jul 8 13:29:19 EDT 1997
- Previous message: Forcible reclamation?
- Next message: Forcible reclamation?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 11:03 AM 7/8/97 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > >The existing space is adequate for a *long* time, provided that we do >reasonable things with it. > >If we start to run out, we can go take back all the people's space who >haven't met even 20% of the current requirements (ie: actual utilization >below 10% of allocated) -- that should reclaim all of the existing Class "A" >addresses, which is 1/4 of the total allocated, and 1/2 of the total >possible IPV4 space. If I understand you correctly, you would move to reclaim, say, a /8 with 0% utilization before a /16 with 0% utilization before a /19 with 33% utilization, correct? --- Larry Vaden, founder and CEO help-desk 903-813-4500 Internet Texoma, Inc. <http://www.texoma.net> direct line 903-870-0365 bringing the real Internet to rural Texomaland fax 903-868-8551 Member of ISP/C, TISPA and USIPA pager 903-867-6571
- Previous message: Forcible reclamation?
- Next message: Forcible reclamation?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list