Class A ARIN Clones
Jeff Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Thu Jul 3 21:07:52 EDT 1997
- Previous message: Class A ARIN Clones
- Next message: pagans@texoma.net principle #1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim and all, Jim Fleming wrote: > > On Thursday, July 03, 1997 10:07 AM, Stephen Sprunk[SMTP:spsprunk at paranet.com] wrote: > <snip> > @ > @ >2.) Must have no more than 4096 PI IPs already, unless it is a new > @ >startup than based on projected size of startup broke down on RFC2050 specs. > @ > @ I don't quite understand your added wording here... If it's a new startup, > @ it won't have ANY PI IPs. My intent was to automatically disqualify people > @ who already have large PI blocks (like, say, BBN who has 3 A's and a dozen > @ B's) from getting anything from the "New ISP" block. > @ > > Maybe companies with /8s ("Class A's") should be > encouraged to become registries and lease out > some of their space, just like ARIN. As long as new > private companies like ARIN are going to be getting > into this business, there is no reason that existing > companies can not participate. I agree. There is no LOGICAL reason why not! > > John Curran of BBN is on the proposed Board of > ARIN. <http://www.arin.net> Maybe he can comment > on whether BBN would be willing to allow allocations > to be made from their stock-pile of addresses. Yes, > routing may have to be adjusted but there could be > other benefits. Yes, "Other bennifits indeed". Maybe a little snoop and poop is in order here for BBN, hummmm? >;) > > Holding 3 /8s is over 1% of the total IPv4 address space > and a higher percentage of the usable space. The > U.S. Government via the Department of Commerce > and the Federal Trade Commission will eventually > have to determine whether these sorts of allocations > give companies an unfair advantage in the market > place. I will be sure that this info gets to the "Right people" at Commerce and Trade. Not to worry... >;) > > That can only happen AFTER companies determine > their costs of renumbering and the costs of obtaining > allocations. Rather than have regulation BEFORE the > fact people have campaigned for review after the fact. > Companies have to add their costs of participating in > these forums into those costs. > > -- > Jim Fleming > Unir Corporation Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng. Information Eng. Group. IEG. INC. Phone :913-294-2375 (v-office) E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
- Previous message: Class A ARIN Clones
- Next message: pagans@texoma.net principle #1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list