pagans@texoma.net principle #5
Jim Fleming
JimFleming at unety.net
Thu Jul 3 15:05:19 EDT 1997
- Previous message: Request for Comment on gTLDs Pursuant to Administrative Procedure Act
- Next message: pagans@texoma.net principle #5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thursday, July 03, 1997 1:00 PM, Larry Vaden[SMTP:vaden at texoma.net] wrote: @ <Principle> The current criteria were implemented by NSI without any clear @ legal authority. @ @ submitted by pagans at texoma.net @ I do not think this is the case. I can not imagine that NSI would want to be responsible for the IP address allocation activities. >From what I understand, that is one of the reasons that NSI is willing to pay to "launch" ARIN. NSI and for that matter SAIC, do not need the "bad PR" that constantly flows from the IP address allocation side of the InterNIC. NSI is probably able to spin the domain name registry business back into the "good PR" light, especially with all of the money they will have once the NSF is out of the picture. (Instant 30% increase in profits.) -- Jim Fleming Unir Corporation
- Previous message: Request for Comment on gTLDs Pursuant to Administrative Procedure Act
- Next message: pagans@texoma.net principle #5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list