NAIPR Message

"leasing" the addresses

On Thursday, February 27, 1997 8:05 PM, Stan Barber[SMTP:sob at academ.com] wrote:
@ Jim:
@ 
@ Thanks for the reference. However, you could have just put it in the message
@ once. There was no need to repeat it four times, especially since I don't see
@ how it addresses the other questions or requests for information or 
@ clarification. Specifcially, it  does not appear to clear up any of the 
@ questions about your claims that the folks involved with ARIN have no 
@ experience in cloning NICs, or provides any references about the history 
@ of the other NICs. Will you be able to address those for me?
@ 
@ It does help answer the first question about the legal proof about IANA.
@ Thanks for that. It will be a most interesting case to track.
@ 
@ -- 
@ Stan   | Academ Consulting Services        |internet: sob at academ.com
@ Olan   | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: {mcsun|amdahl}!academ!sob
@ Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only mine.
@ 
@ 

/**/
//
#
;

http://www.iahc.org/iahc-discuss/mail-archive/1815.html
http://www.iodesign.com/complaint.html

--
Jim Fleming
Unir Corporation

e-mail:
JimFleming at unety.net
JimFleming at unety.s0.g0 (EDNS/IPv8)