Why split IP allocations from the Internic?
On Thursday, February 27, 1997 12:31 PM, Raymundo Vega Aguilar[SMTP:rvega at cicese.mx] wrote:
@ On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Jim Fleming wrote:
@ > What is wrong with the plan to clone the InterNIC many times
@ > that is well underway ?
@ > Here is the short form...
@ > 1. Clone the InterNIC 49 times
@ It's scary that people like this is trying to push *very* wrong ideas,
@ it may look like geting a licence plate for your car because there is
@ an office that keeps things under control, but the parallelism ends there,
@ it is not the same problem.
Besides the 49 states, I would think that Canada and Mexico
would want to develop a "NIC".
Have you given any thought to the posting about the new
U.S. laws and the DOJ briefings ?
JimFleming at unety.net
JimFleming at unety.s0.g0 (EDNS/IPv8)