Implied warranty of routability?
Paul Ferguson
pferguso at CISCO.COM
Sun Feb 2 00:19:25 EST 1997
- Previous message: Removal from list
- Next message: AOP Notification
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hand-waving. The concept that an allocated prefix may be unroutable has nothing to do with ARIN, APNIC, or the RIPE-NCC. The reality of the concept stands alone. A registry cannot, in no way, embody this particular principle, but it can certainly remind it's customers of the fact. - paul At 09:01 PM 2/1/97 -0800, Stephen Satchell wrote: >While the *idea* may be stated in RFC 2050, the concept that the ARIN is a >preferred embodiment of the idea is *not*. I checked. > >This is part of the rationale for ARIN, after all. As such, stating the >fact and recapping the concept in a rationale document is not redundant at >all. > >My pair-o-pennies(tm). > > >At 7:14 PM -0800 2/01/97, Paul Ferguson wrote: >>This is already stated in RFC2050; no need to be redundant. >> >>- paul >>
- Previous message: Removal from list
- Next message: AOP Notification
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the NAIPR mailing list