Implied warranty of routability?
The concept that an allocated prefix may be unroutable has
nothing to do with ARIN, APNIC, or the RIPE-NCC.
The reality of the concept stands alone. A registry cannot,
in no way, embody this particular principle, but it can
certainly remind it's customers of the fact.
At 09:01 PM 2/1/97 -0800, Stephen Satchell wrote:
>While the *idea* may be stated in RFC 2050, the concept that the ARIN is a
>preferred embodiment of the idea is *not*. I checked.
>This is part of the rationale for ARIN, after all. As such, stating the
>fact and recapping the concept in a rationale document is not redundant at
>At 7:14 PM -0800 2/01/97, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>>This is already stated in RFC2050; no need to be redundant.