[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-131: Section 5.0 Legacy Addresses - revised
Ok. Why not?
On 2/11/11, Jack Bates <jbates at brightok.net> wrote:
> On 2/11/2011 2:32 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> Based on this feedback from the author, I oppose proposal 131. Singling
>> out legacy resources to be treated differently in this manner is harmful
>> and contrary to the interests of the community.
> +1'ing the more verbose email by Owen that I agree with.
> Legacy resources should not be singled out in this manner.