[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 117: Required Resource Reviews - text revised
The proposal originator submitted a revised version of the proposal.
Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
Summary of changes:
Reworded paragraph 10(b) to bring in line with staff recommendation and
incorporate feedback from counsel.
Removed paragraph 10(c) to incorporate feedback from counsel
Renumbered 10(d) to 10(c)
Renumbered 10(e) to 10(d)
Added new 10(e) to accommodate staff feedback requesting clarification
that 12.2(c) does not exempt most of these reviews.
--------Revised policy text-----------
Policy Proposal 117: Required Resource Reviews
Proposal Originator: Owen DeLong
Proposal Version: 2
Date: 6 July 2010
Proposal type: new
Policy term: permanent
Replace the text "under sections 4-6" in section 12, paragraph 7 with
"under paragraphs 12.4 through 12.6"
Add to section 12 the following text:
10. Except as provided below, resource reviews are conducted at the
discretion of the ARIN staff. In any of the circumstances mentioned
below, a resource review must be initiated by ARIN staff:
a. Report or discovery of an acquisition, merger, transfer, trade or
sale in which the infrastructure and customer base of a network move
from one organization to another organization, but, the applicable IP
resources are not transferred. In this case, the organization retaining
the IP resources must be reviewed. The organization receiving the
customers may also be reviewed at the discretion of the ARIN staff.
b. Upon receipt by ARIN of one or more credible reports of fraud or
abuse of an IP address block. Abuse shall be defined as use of the block
in violation of the RSA or other ARIN policies and shall not extend to
include general reports of host conduct which are not within ARIN's scope.
c. In the case where an organization wishes to act as recipient of
resources pursuant to a transfer under section 8.3, unless otherwise
prohibited by paragraph 12.2(c).
d. An organization which submits a request for additional resources
when more than 25% of their existing resources are obscured in SWIP or
RWHOIS pursuant to section 220.127.116.11.6 (residential customer privacy).
e. Other than as specified in 12.10(c), paragraph 12.2(c) does not
exempt organizations from the reviews required under section 12.10.
The first change is a minor correction which improves clarity and
consistency of the original policy without changing the meaning.
The addition of 12.10 (a) through (e) serves to create a set of
circumstances under which a resource review is required, rather than
optional and entirely at ARIN staff discretion.
The majority of early comments on this proposal focused on 12.10 (e).
Mostly it was confusion about the exact ramifications. This section will
cause ARIN to maintain greater scrutiny only in cases where a given ISP
issues more than 25% of their total space to residential customers who
wish to remain anonymous and receive network blocks of /29 or larger. To
the best of my knowledge, there are not currently any ISPs which meet
this criteria. Additionally, it would only apply that scrutiny to IPv4,
and will not carry forward into IPv6 residential assignments.
This policy should improve the compliance verification of ARIN policies
and may result in the improved reclamation of under-utilized IP address
space. It should also serve as a deterrent to certain address hoarding
tactics which have come to light in recent history.
Timetable for implementation: Immediately upon ratification by the Board