[arin-ppml] the Transfer Policy Argument Space
John,
Your number 4 resonates with me. I think I keep hearing arguments that
are self satisfying, ie gives "me" a strategic and/or economic
advantage. The perceived benefit can all be undone for many if not the
community at large by 'breaking" the basic function of that we are
trying to extend.
David,
Thanks for your proposal. It is down right rational.
paul
On Sep 3, 2008, at 9:48 AM, John Schnizlein wrote:
> 4. How much burden on the routing infrastructure (DFZ) would be
> produced by the de-aggregation that would result from a transfer
> policy? For example, is the constraint that transfers must be within
> the space administered by a single RIR necessary?