[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 deployment
Paul Vixie
paul at vix.com
Fri Jun 6 23:38:59 EDT 2008
- Previous message: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 deployment
- Next message: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 deployment
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > I would suggest that this policy could be improved by instead focusing > > it's resource requirement on utilizing those fragments. > > > > -M< > > Marty, I agree with you but the common argument against using those small > non-contiguous blocks is that they won't be from a recognizable range that > can be used in filters. > > ----CJ last time i asked routing people about it, prefix length filters were passe. but even if not, is routeability a reasonable consideration for arin policy? (if arin starts allocating these, it'd just end up killing whatever prefix length filters still exist, if any.)
- Previous message: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 deployment
- Next message: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 deployment
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list