[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 deployment
cja@daydream.com
packetgrrl at gmail.com
Fri Jun 6 23:11:26 EDT 2008
- Previous message: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 deployment
- Next message: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 deployment
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > > > > Are there any fragements < /24 in the ARIN inventory of > > > unallocated address space? > > > > > > > > Marin, yes there are. We had a discussion about it at the > > last ARIN meeting at the open policy hour. > > > I would suggest that this policy could be improved by > instead focusing it's resource requirement on utilizing > those fragments. > > > -M< Marty, I agree with you but the common argument against using those small non-contiguous blocks is that they won't be from a recognizable range that can be used in filters. ----CJ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20080606/e4415084/attachment.html
- Previous message: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 deployment
- Next message: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 deployment
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list