[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Equitable Distribution of IPv4 Resources before IPv4 Run out
Stacy Hughes
ipgoddess at gmail.com
Fri Jun 6 19:49:17 EDT 2008
- Previous message: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Equitable Distribution of IPv4 Resources before IPv4 Run out
- Next message: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Equitable Distribution of IPv4 Resources before IPv4 Run out
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I agree with Martin.While it seems to me that large ISPs are vilified for requiring more space than smaller organizations, I need to speak to the fact that they provide space to downstream customers who will _never_ qualify for PI space. We must not forget the true little guys - the /29 customers, the /28 customers - that large ISPs provide space for. This policy could effectively cheat the itty bitty guys out of legitimately needed business resources. I continue to support an organic depletion of the free pool without complication by policy specifically designed to control that process. Stacy On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Martin Hannigan <martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" <mksmith at adhost.com> > To: "Scott Leibrand" <sleibrand at internap.com>, > <arin-ppml at arin.net> > Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Equitable > Distribution of IPv4 Resources before IPv4 Run out > Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 16:26:19 -0700 > > > Hello Scott: > > > > I'm working on a basis assumption that Extra Large > > organizations request more addresses more frequently than > > any of the other groups. So, if allocations proceed > > organically with the last IANA allocation, there is a high > > likelihood that all of the last allocation will go to the > > Extra Large organizations alone. > > Which will also filter down to other smaller guys, no? The > larger networks are fulfilling their needs so that they can > continue to grow their networks and their customers > networks. Theoretically, all that would happen is that > "smaller guys" with PI would have to resort to asking for > "PA". All considered, that's better than getting nothing or > stifling growth of others. Seems most fair to allow the > system to operate on a needs basis right to the end, IMHO. > > > Best, > > -M< > > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN > Public Policy > Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net if you > experience any issues. > -- :):) /S -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20080606/f5308cf1/attachment-0001.html
- Previous message: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Equitable Distribution of IPv4 Resources before IPv4 Run out
- Next message: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Equitable Distribution of IPv4 Resources before IPv4 Run out
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list