[ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal

Ah, but the role of the AC is not now, nor has it ever been limited to process shepherding.

bd


-----Original Message-----
From: ppml-bounces at arin.net on behalf of Randy Bush
Sent: Tue 2/26/2008 4:17 PM
To: Bill Darte
Cc: ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
 
Bill Darte wrote:
> Can I safely assume that your comments are AGAINST the proposal?

<bif> as i do not understand your threat model, i can not speak to your
safety. </bif>

i am surprised that you [ need to ] see my comment as either for or
against.  it was intended to speak to the process, not the proposal.
the sub-text was, since the AC is the process approval body for
proposals, _perhaps_ the AC should not be making proposals itself.

my opinions of the proposal have been stated previously.

randy, who claims no exemption to our culture's rule obsession
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy
Mailing List (PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20080226/0405d9ce/attachment.html