<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7652.24">
<TITLE>RE: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Ah, but the role of the AC is not now, nor has it ever been limited to process shepherding.<BR>
<BR>
bd<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: ppml-bounces@arin.net on behalf of Randy Bush<BR>
Sent: Tue 2/26/2008 4:17 PM<BR>
To: Bill Darte<BR>
Cc: ppml@arin.net<BR>
Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal<BR>
<BR>
Bill Darte wrote:<BR>
> Can I safely assume that your comments are AGAINST the proposal?<BR>
<BR>
<bif> as i do not understand your threat model, i can not speak to your<BR>
safety. </bif><BR>
<BR>
i am surprised that you [ need to ] see my comment as either for or<BR>
against. it was intended to speak to the process, not the proposal.<BR>
the sub-text was, since the AC is the process approval body for<BR>
proposals, _perhaps_ the AC should not be making proposals itself.<BR>
<BR>
my opinions of the proposal have been stated previously.<BR>
<BR>
randy, who claims no exemption to our culture's rule obsession<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
PPML<BR>
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy<BR>
Mailing List (PPML@arin.net).<BR>
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<BR>
<A HREF="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml</A><BR>
Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info@arin.net if you experience any issues.<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>