[ppml] Revision to 2008-3

Steve Bertrand wrote:
> I disagree that a third designation is necessary at all. What happens if 
> for any reason a non-profit 'community' network operator folds, and a 
> commercially driven ISP buys up their assets?
> 
I think there may be some legal issues with a for-profit organization
buying off the assets of a non-profit. What do you think about there
being a restriction that an allocation to a community network be
"non-transferable to any for-profit entity"? Is this a concern,
considering that all IPv6 blocks are, under the NRPM, leased rather than
owned?
> My opinion is that any entity providing any form of Internet service 
> should be classified as an Internet Service Provider.
> 
>> Unlike your cable operator a community network doesn't 
>> have customers, it has members.
> 
> Whether the user of the service is classified as a 'member' or a 
> 'customer', both designations could be put under an umbrella called 
> 'subscriber'.
> 
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy
> Mailing List (PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
> Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-- 
Josh King
--
josh at acornactivemedia.com
--
Senior Network Engineer, Acorn Active Media
(http://www.acornactivemedia.com)
System Administrator, Chambana.net (http://www.chambana.net)
--
"I am an Anarchist not because I believe Anarchism is the final goal,
but because there is no such thing as a final goal." -Rudolf Rocker


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20080403/93c37c22/attachment.bin