[ppml] Revision to 2008-3
Steve Bertrand
steveb at eagle.ca
Thu Apr 3 17:06:22 EDT 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] Revision to 2008-3
- Next message: [ppml] Revision to 2008-3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I disagree that a third designation is necessary at all. What happens if for any reason a non-profit 'community' network operator folds, and a commercially driven ISP buys up their assets? My opinion is that any entity providing any form of Internet service should be classified as an Internet Service Provider. > Unlike your cable operator a community network doesn't > have customers, it has members. Whether the user of the service is classified as a 'member' or a 'customer', both designations could be put under an umbrella called 'subscriber'. Steve
- Previous message: [ppml] Revision to 2008-3
- Next message: [ppml] Revision to 2008-3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list