[ppml] Posting of Legacy RSA and FAQ
John Curran
jcurran at istaff.org
Sun Oct 14 01:56:38 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Posting of Legacy RSA and FAQ
- Next message: [ppml] Posting of Legacy RSA and FAQ
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 10:29 PM -0700 10/13/07, Randy Bush wrote: > > Almost of all the terms parallel the existing RSA agreement, only >> with the addition of recognition that policies shall not diminish >> existing right and privileges of a legacy holder > >oh? then what is section 9? yes, arin may not think the holder has >such rights. but if that was really the case, why would arin make >relinquishing them part of the contract? >... >then why does it demand contractual right to audit? The terms of the current RSA include both of these as well. We tried to stay as close to the current RSA as possible (for fairness to existing members), with the addition of the language which recognizes the legacy holders status with respect to policies which might otherwise reduce their rights. /John
- Previous message: [ppml] Posting of Legacy RSA and FAQ
- Next message: [ppml] Posting of Legacy RSA and FAQ
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list