[ppml] Posting of Legacy RSA and FAQ

John Curran wrote:
> At 10:29 PM -0700 10/13/07, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> Almost of all the terms parallel the existing RSA agreement, only
>>> with the addition of recognition that policies shall not diminish
>>> existing right and privileges of a legacy holder
>> oh?  then what is section 9?  yes, arin may not think the holder has
>> such rights.  but if that was really the case, why would arin make
>> relinquishing them part of the contract?
>> ...
>> then why does it demand contractual right to audit?
> The terms of the current RSA include both of these
> as well.  We tried to stay as close to the current RSA
> as possible (for fairness to existing members), with
> the addition of the language which recognizes the
> legacy holders status with respect to policies which
> might otherwise reduce their rights.

section 9 is a wonderful example of rights reduction.

randy