[ppml] Getting aggressive about vetting

Don't forget that this could be put on the agenda for the Open Policy Hour on Sunday.

Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of
> Robert E. Seastrom
> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 9:04 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [ppml] Getting aggressive about vetting
>
>
> "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm at ipinc.net> writes:
>
> >>From: John Curran [mailto:jcurran at istaff.org]
> >>
> >>*You* are ARIN, so please take action.
> >>
> >>(Policy Proposals welcome)
> >>
> >
> > Let's have just a bit of discussion first, shall we?  Or is the
> > aim of this to get a half-baked policy submitted so it can be
> > rejected?
>
> We're well past the deadline for proposals to be submitted for the
> April meeting.  An actual proposal (yes, actually write it up in
> proposal format, using the template which you can download from
> http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep_template.html ) will have plenty of
> time to be discussed between now and the cutoff for the October
> meeting.  Hint here: the more concise and easily understood a proposal
> is, the better its chances.  People tend to not support things that
> they feel they don't completely understand.
>
> I'll be happy to give you a hand offline if you wish.
>
>                                         ---rob
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List
> (PPML at arin.net).
> Manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml