[ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Renewal and Verification
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Wed Apr 25 14:49:25 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Renewal and Verification
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Renewal and Verification
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I thought so too, however, when I suggested that this fact should be considered as mitigation for fraud concerns expressed about a policy proposal, the chairman of the board suggested that if the community wanted ARIN to be able to take such action, we should submit a policy proposal to support it. So, this proposal is an effort to address the chairman of the board's comments at the public policy meeting. Owen On Apr 25, 2007, at 7:44 AM, Michael Hertrick wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I think this policy is already clearly stated in the ARIN Number > Resource Policy Manual sections 4.1.2 through 4.1.5. > > ~Mike. > > > Member Services wrote: >> ARIN received the following policy proposal. In accordance with the >> ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process, the proposal is >> being posted to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) and >> being placed on ARIN's website. >> >> The AC will review this proposal and may decide to: >> >> 1. Accept the proposal as a formal policy proposal as it is >> presented; >> >> 2. Work with the author to: a) clarify the language or intent of >> the proposal; b) divide the proposal into two (2) or more >> proposals; or c) combine the proposal with other proposals; or, >> >> 3. Not accept the proposal as a formal policy proposal. >> >> The AC will review this proposal at their next regularly scheduled >> meeting. If the AC accepts the proposal, then it will be posted as >> a formal policy proposal to PPML and it will be presented at a >> Public Policy Meeting. If the AC does not accept the proposal, then >> the AC will explain that decision; and at that time the author may >> elect to use the petition process to advance their proposal. If the >> author elects not to petition or the petition fails, then the >> proposal will be closed. >> >> The ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process can be found >> at: http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html >> >> Mailing list subscription information can be found at: >> http://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/index.html >> >> Regards, >> >> Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) >> >> >> ## * ## >> >> >> Policy Proposal Name: Resource Renewal and Verification >> >> Author: Owen DeLong Proposal Version: 0.0.1 >> >> Submission Date: 4/24/07 >> >> Proposal type: new >> >> Policy term: permanent Policy statement: >> >> At any time after a resource is allocated or assigned, ARIN staff >> may audit the usage of the resource to verify that it is in >> compliance with the policies under which it was issued and the RSA >> which governs its use. >> >> Should the staff develop reason to believe that such usage no >> longer meets ARIN policy, ARIN shall immediately notify the >> appropriate POCs and attempt to resolve the issue. Should the >> issue not be resolved to ARIN's satisfaction, ARIN shall have the >> option of not renewing the effected resources at the next renewal >> of the organization. >> >> If renewal is not at least 90 days out when the POC is notified of >> ARIN's decision not to renew, a 90 day grace period shall be >> granted. >> >> Any decision not to renew may be appealed to the BoT who shall act >> an the appeal within 30 days. The decision of the BoT shall be >> final. >> >> Rationale: >> >> It was my understanding that ARIN staff already had this option. >> However, it is not clear in policy that such an option exists. >> Codifying this ability will prevent fraud and reduce the likelihood >> of resources being obtained under false pretense. For example, a >> claim was made at a policy meeting that organizations can/do apply >> under the multi-home policy, then become single-homed and remain >> single-homed, essentially doing an end-run on the multi-home >> policy. >> >> Timetable for implementation: Immediate >> >> _______________________________________________ This message sent >> to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML at arin.net). >> Manage your mailing list subscription at: >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFGL2lccJVdtfpkLb8RAvvEAJ0WRhoz8qEbbMYqEwE8W0hlHLXh+wCdF8IC > +j417Bvb8v2aZQFxKdyTsGo= > =NQxi > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List > (PPML at arin.net). > Manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2105 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20070425/74636c65/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Renewal and Verification
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Renewal and Verification
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list