[ppml] Summary of Trial Balloons for Dealing with IPv4 AddressCountdown
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Fri Apr 20 21:21:30 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Summary of Trial Balloons for Dealing with IPv4 AddressCountdown
- Next message: [ppml] Summary of Trial Balloons for Dealing with IPv4 AddressCountdown
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 16 Apr 2007, at 17:34, Jason Schiller wrote: > When the address space is given out in large blocks, the ISP can > divide up these blocks into reasonably sized pools for each of its > internal regions. This allows for internal aggregation. [...] > This stacking of regional pools will lead to poor internal > aggregation, and thus bloat in the routing and forwarding tables. Do we have any empirical research of this, i.e. can someone who uses large chunks of v4 calculate a model that shows what the effect on the routing table would have been if they'd had to apply for smaller chunks of non-contiguous space more regularly ? Room to breathe in your v4 allocations could have also encouraged sloppiness and wastefulness. (Do we think all of - picking on some companies at random - all of 9/8, 13/8, 15/8, 44/8, etc.,etc. are effective use of large assignments..) A big routing table is bad, we all agree. Running out of v4 is really really bad.
- Previous message: [ppml] Summary of Trial Balloons for Dealing with IPv4 AddressCountdown
- Next message: [ppml] Summary of Trial Balloons for Dealing with IPv4 AddressCountdown
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list