[ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
Kevin Loch
kloch at kl.net
Thu Oct 5 17:11:06 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
- Next message: [ppml] Staff Comments Regarding Policy Proposal 2006-3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > So what is the downside of simply giving out an additional, non- > growable prefix when a /48 isn't enough? This results in involuntary fragmentation just like slow-start in IPv4. > Or just give out the space that would have been reserved immediately, > i.e., give out /44s instead of /48s? That provides more space with which to voluntarily deaggregate. That could be a feature or a problem depending on your perspective. It could also be seen as unnecessarily wasteful since /48 is already a very generous minimum assignment. I like the bisection method. It provides the maximum ability to expand delegations without fragmentation. It also removes any perceived relationship between reserved space and your delegation. - Kevin
- Previous message: [ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
- Next message: [ppml] Staff Comments Regarding Policy Proposal 2006-3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list