[ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
Andrew Dul
andrew.dul at quark.net
Thu Oct 5 17:28:55 EDT 2006
- Previous message: [ppml] Staff Comments Regarding Policy Proposal 2006-3
- Next message: [ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> -------Original Message------- > From: Kevin Loch <kloch at kl.net> > Subject: Re: [ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve > Sent: 05 Oct '06 13:11 > > Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > > So what is the downside of simply giving out an additional, non- > > growable prefix when a /48 isn't enough? > > This results in involuntary fragmentation just like slow-start > in IPv4. > > > Or just give out the space that would have been reserved immediately, > > i.e., give out /44s instead of /48s? > > That provides more space with which to voluntarily deaggregate. That > could be a feature or a problem depending on your perspective. It could > also be seen as unnecessarily wasteful since /48 is already a very > generous minimum assignment. > > I like the bisection method. It provides the maximum ability to expand > delegations without fragmentation. It also removes any perceived > relationship between reserved space and your delegation. In general, bisection seems like a good strategy. The problem with bisection from my perspective is what happens when the super-block you are assigning from becomes close to "full." In this case ARIN has decided to assign IPv6 PI from the block 2620:0000:/23 (http://www.arin.net/reference/ip_blocks.html). Because of the IPv6 policy agreed to between IANA & the RIRs. ARIN can't go back and get more IPv6 address space until they have assigned/allocated/reserved 50% of the space they have been given. At least that is how I read the policy. (http://www.icann.org/policies/proposed-ipv6-policy-14jul06.htm) If you are assigning /48s without reservations then you force bisection down to the /47 level. If any org wants to grow bigger than a /47 then you force fragmentation by not having a reserve. The IPv6 policy between the RIRs & IANA recognizes reserved address space as "unavailable" for the purposes for obtaining additional address resources from IANA. The reserve method isn't perfect, but I believe it is reasonable based upon what we know now. Andrew
- Previous message: [ppml] Staff Comments Regarding Policy Proposal 2006-3
- Next message: [ppml] Fwd: Keeping in reserve
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list