[arin-discuss] Importance of Corporate Governance

Exactis v. MAPS (Colorado District Court Case Number 00-CV-2250) 
cited charges of Tortious Interference with Contract, Tortious 
Interference with Prospective Business Relations, violation of the 
Colorado Consumer Protection Act, Intentional and Negligent 
Misrepresentation and Extortion, violation of the Colorado 
Communications Privacy Act, violation of the Colorado Organized Crime 
Control Act, violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, violation of the 
Colorado Antitrust act

		--Dean

On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:

> > The Exactis V. MAPS case was indeed an organized crime case.
> 
> > The facts I cited are true. 
> 
> Not according to this copy of the court motion
> http://www.dotcomeon.com/exactis1.html
> 
> In that document, the claim of organized crime does not 
> appear in the Statement of Facts (section II) but in the
> Legal Argument (section III).
> 
> According to this record
> http://www.dotcomeon.com/exactis.html
> the lawsuit with its claim of organized crime, did
> not succeed, as Exactis claimed it would in their 
> injunction request. Instead, the case was dismissed.
> 
> Half truths and innuendo are not facts.
> 
> --Michael Dillon
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-Discuss
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN 
> Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net
> if you experience any issues.
> 
> 

-- 
Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000